Home Aviaries For Sale
are nervous, by Alicia Kirchner (for "Miradas al Sur" of 04/11/1924)
Miradas al Sur. Year 3. Issue No. 153. Sunday April 24, 2011
For
Alicia Kirchner, Minister de Desarrollo Social de la Nación
politica@miradasalsur.com
La gestión soberana de los recursos es un compromiso indelegable
Una vez más, en los últimos días, hemos presenciado a través de los medios de comunicación reacciones desmesuradas por el establishment empresarial, vinculadas al capital trasnacional. Estas expresiones intentan una vez más hegemonizar la opinión pública con un discurso crítico que asocia la presencia y participación del Estado en la economía, como un avasallamiento al sector privado. Estas expresiones carecen de aval jurídico y económico.El National Government decided to exercise sovereign rights arising from their participation as a shareholder, according to a limitation inconsistent with corporate law. Strictly speaking, the measure complements the legislative amendment recovered Argentine pension system with full recognition of the national state as the sole administrator of the pension funds, a condition that was diminished with the creation of the administrators. The Argentine State recovered and sovereign management of the resources of the Argentine workers and faithful to this act.
The appointment of directors by the national government in companies where shareholding is not only a right but an obligation. Many of these media-who are outraged by the appointment of directors by the state, are strong advocates of the Brazilian economy, but they say that the National Bank of Economic and Social Development (BNDES) is a state bank , which also has a significant number of managers at various companies in which the bank is accionista.Pero addition, the State not only has the right to make it deems appropriate managers in companies where it owns shareholdings it is also their obligation, because through their money managers to take care of the Guarantee Fund Sustainability depends on the Anses through two mechanisms:
a) Firstly, the Guarantee Fund rightful part of earnings distributed in proportion to their shares. Therefore, the state has an obligation to control the profits of companies where the state holds shares. In this way, the director representing the state would serve as money to care workers and retirees.
b) Secondly, to positively influence the decisions of the directory can get companies to deepen investment measures and thus produce more and generate more and more jobs, also causing more resources to Anses due to the increased number of active workers would be contributing to the pension system, which would allow the Anses have more resources for greater restructuring of the pension benefits.
Fear of transparency.
The question then arises: is it a company where the State has shareholdings is adamantly opposed to it when you can not do legally? Pushing Congress and the courts with the maxim "total there is always a nook in the standard to cripple and undermine the equality before the law. " A primary cause of this opposition would be given against the fear of being transparent certain numbers, for example, the rate of profit and profitability and how to distribute their utilidades.Eso, by the company, but media corporations exist cause a little deeper, and this is an anti-development view, which displays the state as an enemy, as a problem. In this view, strongly related to the neoliberal programs, the state should be minimal, since any state interference would be contrary to economic and social development of a country. "They are nervous" Nestor say, the truth that concerns the discretion with which they operate. We know from historical experience that the only way to achieve economic development path of national liberation perspective is from the strong partnership between the local business community, the Argentine and the labor movement hegemonic neoliberal corporate organizado.Señala that " Government extends its interference in private enterprise. " Maliciously ignored the legitimate right of the State as a shareholder in these companies to intervene.
repeat: this is workers' money, invested before and at the discretion of the Pension Funds and on which there was no control. Now, recovered these funds, the workers' money back to workers with social investment and to underpin the restoration social.Por tissue that is so important to have freedom of information. Because it is a right of the people and therefore is collective. Subjectivity should not violate the story of the facts. Journalists do not have a passport from extraterrorialidad, allowing them to navigate the intellectual dishonesty. Otherwise is a gross and dangerous omission of the right to information. Hence, the information may be useful for the liberation of the people or it may be the best tool for their addiction.
The State, the tool.
economic and social reconstruction that has been occurring in our country since 2003 is the result of increased state intervention in the defense of common interests and the idea that the state is the best complement to private companies to grow, produce and invest with a fair distribution of income. This phenomenon is evident in the steady increase in public investment that allows one hand, building the infrastructure necessary for economic and social development, but also to the increase in aggregate demand, firms need to sell more and thus encourage them to invest and produce increasingly taking más.Desde Néstor Kirchner, the growth of investment by the state allowed and accompanied the increase in investment by the private sector. The same phenomenon occurred with the social policy conducted by the National Government, such as social security, in productive projects in microcredit, infrastructure, labor unions or specially protected universal child allowance. From the social point of view by giving resources to the most vulnerable in turn intensifies also the economy as consumption increases, allowing businesses and merchants to sell more. In these examples it is clear that the best partner for private companies is the State Nacional.Sin however, still live with expressions of anti-development vision to envision the state as an obstacle to development. Disrupt this paradigm is, in economic terms, a major cultural disputes that we have been giving since 2003, both discursively and in the set of economic policies that we applied. Therefore, the consolidation and deepening of re-industrialization model with social inclusion is the challenge of our government, because ultimately, as CFK said: "We are not campaign promises. Was necessary to demonstrate that since the policy could govern and manage the state's resources to benefit all sectors. The only commitment that we always assume it was not to let the convictions on the door of Government House.. "
Published in:
http://sur.elargentino.com/notas/estan-nerviosos
0 comments:
Post a Comment